August 24, 2008 by editor.
The race in the National League East has heated up and will be a dogfight the rest of the way. The Marlins took the early lead but were over-taken by Philadelphia for most of the first half of the season. New York has over-taken both of them by finally playing up to their capabilities. Now, only a few games separate all three teams. They all have trouble areas on their respective teams that could keep each of them out of the post season.
To the extent they are able to overcome those weak areas will go a long way in determining whether they go to the post season.
Philadelphia Phillies
The Phillies have had problems scoring runs on a consistent basis. Even though Ryan Howard has been very productive hitting home-runs and driving in runs, but is only hitting in the .230’s. Chase Utley struggled after the All Star break, and is now starting to come around. He has still been very productive, (31 home-runs, 85 RBI), but he threatened to run away with the MVP award in the National League in the first half.
It is no surprise that they started having problems at the plate when he tailed off. Jimmy Rollins has been injured and has not performed up to his MVP status. That has hurt as well. Hitting .258 with only 8 home runs is below his standards. Jason Werth has done a pretty good job, but I believe this team misses Aaron Rowand. He got a lot of big hits for them last year, and they miss his clutch bat.
With their ballpark and the talent they have they should turn it around. The pitching is another matter. For the first half of the year their bullpen statistically was the best in the National League, but they have been vulnerable there of late. They cannot afford that because they have some serious issues with their starting pitching, and if they over use their bullpen that would be disastrous.
The pressure is on Cole Hamels and Jamie Moyer to have quality starts almost every time out because Kyle Kendrick and Joe Blanton are wild cards. You don’t know what you are going to get from start to start. If Philadelphia doesn’t win the division it will be because of their starting pitching. Brad Lidge has to stay healthy as well. He is perfect in save opportunities and gives the Phillies a decided advantage over the Mets, who currently don’t have a closer.
Playing .500 ball as they have been lately isn’t going to cut it though.
Florida Marlins
Very few want to acknowledge that the Marlins are in this race to stay. They have fallen behind by five games in the standings, they are by no means out of it. They are currently slumping at the plate and the home run barrage by their infield has slowed down some in the second half of the season.
What also haunts the Marlins is their pitching. They have given up 633 runs so far this year, as opposed to the Mets and the Phillies who have given up 575 and 540 respectively. If Florida’s starters don’t deliver they are in deep trouble.
As the Marlins are finding out that you can’t hit your way out of every situation. The pitching inconsistencies got magnified when their torrid power hitting fell off after the All Star break. Florida is hitting .239 and slugging .398 in August as a team. Only Philadelphia and Cincinnati are hitting worse for average in the same time period.
If Florida’s bats don’t get hot soon they will find themselves out of the race. As it stands now New York and Philadelphia are very streaky and can be caught, but time is running out on the Marlins.
New York Mets
The Mets have taken over first place in the division with their stellar play in the second half. In spite of a rash of injuries to their pitching staff (Billy Wagner and John Maine) they continue to be one of the best teams in the National League over the last two months.
One reason has been the turnaround at the plate of Carlos Delgado. He has hit for power, and in key situations, which has taken the heat off of David Wright and Jose Reyes. When Delgado has it going their line-up is very formidable.
The biggest problem for New York is their very leaky bullpen. Aaron Heilman has been a disaster, and Duaner Sanchez has not been the same coming back from injury last year. Billy Wagner may not be able to close a game for the rest of the season, and the rest are up and down at best.
This is the biggest hurdle the Mets have to jump over. If you can’t depend on your bullpen to hold one or two run leads late in games, you are in trouble. It is really amazing that they have been able to overtake Philadelphia considering the amount of games they let get away in the later innings.
This really puts a lot of pressure on the starters to go late into games. The only starter who can be counted on to do that consistently is Johan Santana.
Philadelphia is probably in the best shape to overcome their issues. Their line-up should get hot and carry them at least for a stretch in September. They have a reliable closer, and their bullpen is good enough to get by in their division. They are not a lock, but if their starting pitching holds up they have the best chance.
True or not, the perception now is that the Phillies are the better all around team, even if they have not played up to their capabilities. They can’t count on New York handing it to them like last year, they have to go out and win it.
Florida will have to count on the Mets and Phillies coming down a bit, and their bats heating up to the level they were on before the All Star break. Short of that happening I don’t think they will be there at the end.
It just doesn’t make sense that New York can hold up untill the end of the season with their bull pen in shambles. Relief pitching is too important in this day and age to operate with one that actually puts confidence in the opposing team when they are called upon. They can hit, and their starting pitchers as a group are good enough. It will be a minor miricle in my view if they make it to the post season.
The Mets will have to perform well when they play Philadelphia head to head, and pad their record against teams like Atlanta and Washington if they want to put themselves in position to win the division.
Posted in Baseball | Print | No Comments »
July 26, 2008 by editor.
The Yankees crept closer to Boston in the standings by beating them at Fenway 10-3. New York has won the first two games of this pivotal series and remained undefeated since the All Star break. Andy Pettitte led the way by pitching six effective innings after a rocky start where he had problems finding the strike zone.
Robinson Cano continued his torrid hitting with three hits including a home-run off of knuckleballer Tim Wakefield. He also added a two run double in the eighth inning. Four Yankee pitchers combined for three scoreless innings to to finish the game.
The Yankees added to their roster by acquiring outfielder Xavier Nady and reliever Damaso Marte from the Pittsburgh Pirates for the New York’s top outfield prospect Jose Tabata and three minor league pitchers, Dan McCutchen, Jeff Karstens, and Ross Ohlendorf. Nady was in the starting line-up against Boston on Saturday and Marte faced one batter.
The move was necessitated by injuries to Jorge Posada and Hideki Matsui, and it adds a right-handed presence to a lefty dominated line-up. To make room on the roster the Yankees optioned Brett Gardner to Scranton/Wilkes-Bare, and designated reliever LaTroy Hawkins for assignment.
New York pulled to within 2.5 games of first place with the win and will go for the sweep on Sunday. Sidney Ponson will take the ball for the Yankees, and Jon Lester will be on the mound for the Red Sox. Lester is 8-3 on the season with a 3.20 ERA, and Ponson is 6-1. The loss by Boston was only the third time this season they have lost two in a row at home.
Boston has reason to be worried because New York is peaking, and showing no signs of letting up. They are getting solid pitching and their bats have come alive. Bolstering their line-up and bullpen with this last trade didn’t hurt either. The race in the American League East is far from over.
Posted in Baseball | Print | No Comments »
July 23, 2008 by editor.
Mike Mussina won his thirteen game of the year as the Yankees extended their home winning streak to 10 games by besting Glenn Perkins and the Twins 5-1. In the process New York stretched their home winning streak to 10 games.
Minnesota gift wrapped this win for the Yankees with a crucial mental error in the fifth inning. Second baseman Alexi Casilla took a throw to force a runner out at second base and started running off the field thinking it was the third out instead of turning the double play and getting out of the inning.
The next batter, Justin Christian, promptly doubled home two runs and the Yankees never looked back. New York is now eleven games over .500 and trail the first place Rays by 3.5 games, and Boston by just 3. This sets up a three game show-down with the second place Red Sox beginning Friday the 25th.
Friday’s match up features Josh Beckett vs. Joba Chamberlain. Beckett pitched a complete game in a loss to the Angels and Chamberlain pitched six good innings versus the A’s and got a no decision.
Andy Pettitte takes the ball for the Yankees versus Tim Wakefield on Saturday. In their last outings Pettitte pitched very effectively and beat the A’s while Wakefield lost to Angels. Wakefield has a no decision in his only start versus New York this year.
Jon Lester will pitch in game three on Sunday. The Yankees have not announced who they will start. Lester has pitched well and is 4-1 this year at Fenway. His last effort was against the Mariners where he held them scoreless for 7 1/3 innings.
The Yankees added Richie Sexton to their roster as a much needed weapon against left handed pitching, which they have struggled against. It will be interesting to see how he fits in. Jorge Posada elected not to have season ending surgery on his throwing shoulder, opting to do rehab instead. New York is hoping that Johnny Damon’s injury woes are over.
Over-all health will be a critical issue for the Yankees as hope to continue their winning ways. They need all of their bats. The pitching has been solid in every way, so it looks like they will be in the race for the long haul.
Posted in Baseball | Print | No Comments »
July 20, 2008 by editor.
When we start talking about great rivalries, we have to first determine the criteria that that we will use to come to our conclusions. With so many teams and individuals on a professional and collegiate level that would qualify for this list, we will keep it down to something that is workable.
The definition of the word rivals : two competitors pursuing the same object, but with equal tenacity in their quest to surpass the other. In sports that is normally when both competitors or teams have a lot of history between them, and the stakes are high.
One criteria has to be fan enthusiasm and participation. The fans have to be jacked for the contest, and it has to mean something. If nothing is on the line then it takes away from the rivalry. There are times however, when there is nothing on the line, that the respective fans of both teams dislike each other so much, that it doesn’t matter that there is nothing on the line.
Both teams or participants have to be consistently good. It won’t generate as much of a buzz if one or both teams are down, or just not that good. That will have to be factored in.
There must be history there between the teams or athletes involved. The more history in many cases means the rivalry is more intense.
Geographical location will be a consideration as well. Natural rivalries develop over time where teams have a common border, or are inter-state. This is very prevalent in college sports.
They will be listed in no particular order, and it will be open for debate which are the best.
Joe Frazier vs. Muhammad Ali
This was a boxing rivalry to end all boxing rivalries. The first time they fought in 1971 the fight was so hyped that it seemed that it could never live up to it’s billing. It was called at the time, and is still referred to by many, as the fight of the century. Both men were undefeated and about as different as they come. Ali was the brash, trash talking anti-war Muslim who took on the establishment, and Frazier was the Bible reading Christian who liked to sing.
Frazier would win that epic battle and knock Ali down in the 15th round. This would be the only fight out of the three that Frazier would win. The rematch in January of 1974 was called “Superfight” and Ali would get his revenge. He would dominate the fight with his lightning quick punches and movement.
In the pre-fight press conference Frazier got tired of the name calling and the taunts Ali dished out and attacked him. Needless to say there was no love loss between the two.
The third fight, the Thrilla in Manila, in 1975 was a tremendous ending to this rivalry where both men dished out serious punishment, but Ali tortured Frazier in the later rounds worse than anyone had ever done. Frazier couldn’t answer the bell for the fourteenth .
These men put each other in the hospital and inflicted permanent damage to each other, and when they were through, they ended up respecting each other. For us, we will never see heavyweights like this again.
Sugar Ray Leonard vs. Thomas Hearns
September 16, 1981 at Caesars Palace was the place where the two best welterweights met for the first time in the ring. There was no love loss between them, particularly with Hearns. I believed he hated the fact that Sugar Ray got more attention and was the flashier of the two.
The first fight would go down as the fight of the decade. Leonard was losing the fight and had to stalk Hearns in the late rounds until he would catch up to him and knock him out. The ironic thing was that they reversed their natural tendencies for much of the fight. Leonard the boxer with the speed and finesse became the hunter, and Hearns with his punching power became the boxer with the effective jab.
This fight sealed Leonard’s greatness, and made Hearns yearn for another opportunity to prove he was better. They would fight again and the match would be scored as a draw, but most think that Hearns won the fight.
Sugar Ray Leonard vs. Roberto Duran
Duran was a hall of famer who was a beast, and finished with a record of 104-16 with 69 knockouts. Duran thought Leonard was less of a man than he was, and in their first fight, which was a 15 round war, Leonard ignored conventional wisdom and stood in front of Duran the whole fight and duked it out with him. In trying to prove to Duran that he was not afraid of him, he fell into his trap.
It was one of the best fights in welterweight history, but Leonard took the loss. In the rematch, Leonard used his boxing speed, style, and counter-punching ability to humiliate Duran into quiting in the eighth round. Leonard also taunted Duran during the fight. No one had ever done this to Duran before.
Duran was know for his brutality, but was reduced to a loser , quitter, and a traitor. Nine years would pass and they fought again when they were well past their primes, and Leonard dominated that one as well. The “no mas” fight will always be remembered, and these men would forever be linked together like Ali and Frazier were.
Lakers vs. Celtics
The Magic vs. Bird rivalry started in the college championship game in 1979 and continued into the professional ranks. No other personal rivalry actually carried over like this one did. That being said, the Boston vs. L.A. rivalry started long before Magic and Bird came on the scene.
Overall the Lakers and Celtics have met 11 times in NBA finals since 1959, with Boston winning nine of them. Bird and Magic coming into the NBA was significant because up unto that time the NBA was in a down period and the battles that they would have against each other generated a tremendous amount of interest.
It was the slower, plodding, team-work oriented Celtics vs the showtime, fast-breaking, highlight reel Lakers. Many times fans made it the mostly Caucasian Celtics vs. the mostly African American Lakers. It forced all the fans to pick sides. These star studded battles revitalized the NBA and Magic and Bird were the star of stars. They rescued the NBA from low attendance and low television ratings
Over-all, Magic would get the better of it against Bird winning two championships(1985 and 1987) head to head versus one (1984).
Other Lakers vs. Celtic battles would feature Bill Russell and Bob Cousy for Boston, and Elgin Baylor and Jerry West for Los Angeles.
Larry Bird vs. Magic Johnson
We have to mention these two seperately from the Boston, L.A. rivalry because of what was at stake when they played, the intensity of the battles, and the way the fans took sides and debated who was better. They were both great, but I would have to Magic the slight edge.
Bill Russell vs. Wilt Chamberlain
These two warriors met 142 times in 10 years and was unquestionably the most talked about match-up in basketball in the 1960’s and is still debated today. Keep in mind that the game was a little different then than it is now. Bill and Wilt guarded each other every time they played. That wouldn’t happen today because most times the two teams best players don’t guard each other so they can stay out of foul trouble.
Chamberlain averaged 28.7 points and 28.7 rebounds in those games and Russell averaged 14.5 points and 23.7 rebounds. Russell’s teams fared far better. In that time period he won nine championships to Wilt’s one. Who was better? I will let you decide.
New York Knicks vs. Miami Heat
In the 1990’s no one could doubt the ill will that these two teams had for each other. It involved the teams, the fans, and the front offices. Pat Riley leaves the Knicks under bad circumstances to coach the Heat and all of a sudden things get ugly.
These were two teams built on physical play and their regular season games and playoff games were all heated. Charlie Ward would tangle with P.J. Brown and it would almost lead to a bench clearing brawl which would cause many Knicks to be suspended for leaving the bench and dooming their playoff chances.
Alonzo Mourning and Larry Johnson get into a full fledged fight in a play-off game, and Jeff VanGundy would grab Mourning’s leg in an ill fated attempt to break it up. He gets dragged across the garden floor in the process. Over a four year period the NBA put these teams on national television every time they could because of what might happen in the game.
For the most part they were all low scoring physical affairs with each point being precious, but that was really how the game is supposed to be played. And then there was the shot. Allan Houston’s jumper with less than a second left eliminated the Heat in a playoff series and added more fuel to this fire.
What made this more interesting was that Jeff VanGundy was a Rily disciple, and Rily’s top assistant at Miami was Stan VanGundy, Jeff’s brother. The Knicks got the better of this rivalry over the years. Fierce is not a strong enough word to describe their match-up. Honorable mention goes to Bulls vs. Pistons in the Jordan era.
Florida State Seminoles vs. Miami Hurricanes
There are so many rivalries in the college game that are intense, that it is hard to highlight one, or just a few. One reason Miami and Florida State stands out because over the years their games affected the whole college football landscape. The games took on more meaning when Bobby Bowden took over Florida State in 1987.
Not only was (and still is) there a definite hatred between the two intrastate rivals, but five losses to Miami have kept Florida State out of national championship games. Thirteen times in the last twenty years they have met when both were ranked in the top ten.
This rivalry has been marked by missed kicks that always seem to go against the Seminoles. Even though both schools are down right now the rivalry is still intense, and over the years there has been more at stake with this game than any other.
Army vs. Navy
We have to put the Army vs. Navy game on this list as well. When the men who protect us get together and play this game amidst the pageantry and the pre-game march on to the field, we all have to stand up and take notice. They are the most well trained and disciplined that we have, and in many ways this rivalry tops the list.
Honorable mention: Auburn vs. Alabama, U.S.C. vs. Notre Dame, Oklahoma vs. Texas, Georgia vs. Florida, Michigan vs. Ohio State.
Boston Red Sox vs. New York Yankees
Many feel that this is the fiercest, and most bitter rivalry in all of sports, and it doesn’t seem to be quieting down. Since the wild card was instituted, they have played in the American League Championship Series three times, with the Yankees winning twice.
They finished tied at the end of the regular season in 1978 and played a famous one game playoff in Fenway that won by the Yankees 5-4. The big hit was a three run home run by the light hitting Bucky Dent. That season was memorable because Boston had a fourteen game lead on the Yankees at one point.
The ALCS in 2003 had some fireworks that resulted in a bench clearing altercation that resulted in Yankee coach Don Zimmer charging Pedro Martinez and being thrown to the ground. This series was intense, and Boston actually led game seven 5-2 in the eighth inning, when Red Sox manager Grady Little decided to leave a tired Pedro Martinez in the game.
New York staged a one out rally with three straight hits to make the lead 5-3, and when Little left Martinez out there, Jorge Posada doubled in the tying runs. The Yankees ended up winning on an Aaron Boone home-run in the eleventh inning. This added to the feeling by the Red Sox nation that they were cursed.
Boston would turn things around, but the animosity between the teams would never wane. In 2004, Alex Rodriguez and Jason Varitek got into a fight that resulted in another bench clearing brawl. Both teams would finish first and second in the division and meet for the second straight year in the ALCS, and it didn’t disappoint as far as drama is concerned.
The Yankees led the series three games to none, and Mariano Rivera was on the mound in game four to save a 4-3 game. Boston would come back and win this game, and begin what would go down as the biggest collapse in major league playoff history. The Red Sox would go on to win the World Series that year and since then have not looked back.
In 2005 both teams lost in separate divisional series, but Boston, after not making the playoffs in 2006, would win their first American League East Championship since 1995 and go on to win the World Series.
Red Sox and Yankee fans go further than having a healthy dislike for their counterparts. Boston fans won’t root for any New York team in any sport, and vice versa. Even at this years All Star game, when Red Sox closer Jonathan Papelbon came in the game for the AL, he was booed mercilessly because of perceived disrespect aimed at Mariano Rivera.
Someone actually went so far as to bury a Red Sox jersey in the foundation of the new Yankee Stadium, believing that would jinx them. The news about it became public, and the construction crew searched for it and subsequently found it and took it out. Enough said.
NFL Football has so many great rivalries it’s hard to center on one or two. The Bears and Packers had a great rivalry in the old NFL days, but in modern times this has been nothing special. Chiefs and Raiders, Steelers and Browns, and Giants and Cowboys have a lot of history, but we will choose another.
Pittsburgh Steelers vs. Oakland Raiders
This was a rivalry that could have been played out in a back alley or an Mixed Martial Arts ring. For about six years between 1972 - 1977 these two viciously beat on each other and called it football. The Raiders specialized in intimidating their opponents, and Pittsburgh’s steel curtain backed down from no one.
Raider safety George Atkinson knocked Lynn Swann out with a forearm to the head after a play was over, on the other side of the field, that resulted in a lawsuit being filed by Chuck Noll. Atkinson countered by suing Noll for slander.
Keep in mind that a lot of the bitterness came from the fact that both teams had unbelievable talent. Nineteen players from the teams from this era have been inducted into the hall of fame, and they were constantly competing for the right to go to the Super Bowl. They met in three straight AFC championship games from 1974-1976.
The most famous moment was the immaculate reception game in 1972, where Franco Harris caught a deflected pass just before it hit the carpet and scored the winning touchdown with little time left. To this day, former Raider players say they were cheated by the officials on the play. This rivalry was one of the nastiest in NFL history, if the nastiest.
Honorable Mention: Redskins vs. Cowboys from 1970-1983, Colts vs Patriots (current), Steelers vs Cowboys.
Raphael Nadal vs. Roger Federer
On the tennis courts, history is being made every time these two meet. Nadal is the physical young bull, and Federer is the smooth, unflappable assassin. They are the best in their sport and most of their matches have been epic battles.
Federer’s legacy as the best ever has been thwarted by losses in three French Open finals, and this past Wimbledon final, which was probably the greatest match ever played. Nadal has been frustrated by Federer on the grass as well until this year.
They have brought out the best in each other and do it in a way that is different than all the other rivalries we have mentioned before. There is no ill will between them, and they praise each other as top notch players.
These two are so good and battle so hard, that they have drawn fans to the sport that were indifferent before. This is the top individual rivalry going on today. There is not another that comes close.
Honorable mention: Borg vs. McEnroe
Tiger Woods vs Nobody
We are currently waiting for someone to step up and replace Nobody. I don’t think it will happen.
Montreal Canadiens vs. Toronto Maple Leafs
Canada is serious about their hockey, and this was their version of the Hatfield’s and the McCoys. Through 1970 they were the only teams north of the American border, so every time they met it was a big deal. From 1944 to 1978 they met twelve times in the playoffs, and faced off in five Stanley Cup finals.
This rivalry is symbolic of a rift in their history and society- the English and the French Canadians. The English were British, conservative, and Protestant, and the French Canadians were Roman Catholic and liberal.
Duke Blue Devils vs. North Carolina Tarheels
Also known as the battle of Tobacco Road, is the most fierce rivalry we have in college basketball. The intensity of the rivalry is inflamed by the proximity of the two universities, located only eight miles apart. These teams are always among the ACC’s top teams and every time they meet it is a huge deal.
Former North Carolina coach Dean Smith and current Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski are hall of fame coaches that have presided over some of the best and hotly contested battles between the two schools.
There are other college basketball rivalries, but this one is the gold standard. None of the others have quite the bite that this one has.
Rivalries are what help to make sports what it is. It lets us know that that there is something other than just money that is driving our athletes. Thanks, to the rivalries past, as we look forward to the future rivalries.
Posted in Uncategorized | Print | No Comments »
July 16, 2008 by editor.
The New York Yankees limped into the All Star break losing three out of four games, (one to Pittsburgh and two out of three to Toronto) and face some daunting questions as they look to make up ground in the American League East in the second half of the season.
Hideki Matsui still has injury problems, and there is a chance he may not make it back this year. Johnny Damon is still out and the Yankees have been plugging the holes with their youth. They probably still have enough fire power in their line-up despite those injuries, but they need to stay relatively injury free if they are going to catch the Red Sox and the Rays.
A-Rod and Jorge Posada have spent time on the disabled list also.
The biggest injury for New York has been to their ace, Chien-Ming Wang. If it wasn’t for Mike Mussina coming through with an unexpectedly good first half, the may not be over five hundred. The bullpen has been surprisingly solid, and Jose Veras and Kyle Farnsworth have been effective setting up for Mariano Rivera. That has made Joba Chamberlain’s transition to the rotation seamless.
The Yankees first series after the break is against a surprising contender, the Oakland A’s. They are six games back of the Angels and and will try to make up ground. Joe Blanton will start for the A’s against Mike Mussina in Yankee Stadium on Friday. Blanton has been up and down in the first half and has twelve losses.
New York needs to jump on Blanton quickly and set the tone for the series. The Yankees have beaten him already this year so they hope to continue that trend. Mussina has a winning record lifetime against Oakland so this match-up favors New York. Look for the Yankees to start quickly and win this first series coming out of the gate.
Posted in Baseball | Print | No Comments »
July 11, 2008 by editor.
We were treated to one of the most, if not the most, entertaining and thrilling Wimbledon’s in recent history. Yes, the men’s final was the most competitive and dramatic match in the history of the sport, because of the quality of the match and what was at stake.
Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal left everything and more on center court, and it was truly a shame that someone had to lose. Nadal took control of the match early with his penetrating forehands and went up two sets to none.
It looked like he would win in straight sets and Federer wasted break point after break point. Federer would show that he not only had the skill to overcome any challenge on his favorite surface, but he showed he had the mental toughness necessary for a champion to deal with his number one nemesis.
After two tie-breaks, one in which Federer was down five to two, it was two sets apiece, but Nadal’s resolve would not diminish. Rafa’s toughness would not allow him to wilt under the pressure the five time champ would inflict. He would not allow Federer to break his serve over the final three plus sets, which was really the difference in the match.
Both men showed unbelievable mental fortitude that most athletes in other sports don’t possess, and neither would choke. This match show-cased the best professional tennis had to offer, and proved that Federer and Nadal should be in the conversation when we talk about the best athletes in the world.
Not only do they have the skill that comes from being trained in their craft almost every day from their youth, but they have something else that most professional athletes don’t. Humility and sportsmanship. Nadal always defers to Federer as number one in the game when asked. Federer said he tried everything but to no avail, and that Nadal was a worthy champion.
Federer is a class act and represents the sport with dignity and a conservative style that reminds everyone that it is a gentleman’s sport. Nadal exudes the youthful qualities of a young man that really doesn’t take it for granted what he has achieved. Even when proded with questions about his greatness he always says that any of the men in the draw can win, and that it is unbelievable that he has been this successful.
What we have is a rivalry for the ages where they both want to win and re-write history, but respect each other and the game enough not to take verbal shots at each other. Our athletes today should take a page out of these guy’s book. It’s about being mentally and physically in shape, believing in your abilities, never quiting, and being humble.
We also remember what Dominick Hrbaty did in his match with Federer as well. The two are friends, and this was Hrbaty’s last Wimbeldon before he retired, so before the last game he broke with tradition and decided to sit next to Federer and chat. I thought that was a great moment that you don’t normally see.
These guys made people who don’t normally care about tennis stand up and take notice. Honorable mention goes to Marat Safin, and Rainer Schuettler. No one expected them to get through to the semi-finals. Adding to the unpredictability of this years Wimbledon was Novak Djokovic, who, after mouthing off that Federer was done and it was his and Nadal’s time, lost in the second round to Safin.
Adding to the drama, and lost in the weight of the men’s final was the quality of the women’s final between Venus and Serena Williams. You have to appreciate the fact that we are watching history continually being made, and that this probably will never happen again. Two sisters, both multiple grand slam champions, Americans, who desperately want more titles before they retire, even at the expense of each other.
Right now they are the best that tennis has to offer on the women’s side. Most of the higher ranked women went out early. Most notably Maria Sharapova and the new number one, Anna Ivanovic. Ivanovic showed in her post match interview why she will be heard from again. She knew she was not mentally ready for what comes with being ranked number one, and she pledged to learn from her Wimbledon experience. She was not too torn up about it. She handled her second round exit well.
All in all, this was the most memorable Wimbledon I can remember, and I have seen a lot of them. I only hope that our American athletes in football, basketball and baseball show the class and respect that Nadal and Federer showed. They are proof that you can compete with an edge, and even in disappointment teach your peers and younger players how to conduct themselves.
Posted in Tennis | Print | No Comments »
June 29, 2008 by editor.
The Chicago Bulls need help at the General Manager position to turn their team’s future around. They have been helped by the horrible management and judgement of the New York Knicks, but still can’t get over the hump.
The Chicago Bulls seemed poised to make the jump from a rebuilding team, to a perenial contender for the Eastern Conference championship after the 2004, and 2005 seasons as they made the playoffs two years in a row showcasing their young talent.
Ben Gordon, Luol Deng, and Chris Duhon were drafted, and along with Kirk Hinrich, made the fans and management believe they turned the corner and were ready to make the jump to the next level. After a successful 2004-2005 season where they made the playoffs, John Paxon made a bold move that should have put the Bulls in a position to get everything they needed.
He traded Eddie Curry to the Knicks for Michael Sweetney, Tim Thomas, Jermaine Jackson, a first round pick and two second round picks. The net result of all of Paxon’s wheeling and dealing with the Knicks over the years was two first round picks where they could switch positions with New York.
With Chicago’s best players being perimeter players, this was their opportunity to upgrade their front line with a proven post up scorer and add a serious front line presence. While the league laughed at the Knicks, the joke was on Chicago as they turned a plethora of draft picks and trades into a dysfunctional and confused team.
In the 2006 draft, Chicago drafted LaMarcus Aldridge which was a good move and filled a definite need, but they proceeded to trade him for Tyrus Thomas, who has no concrete offensive game and is a tween-er. That move made no sense at all.
Chicago was one of the best defensive teams in the Eastern Conference, but they made another mistake in trading Tyson Chandler to the Hornets for P.J. Brown and J.R. Smith. Chandler may not have been a go to low post option but he guarded the basket and rebounded the ball very well. Big mistake.
The worst mistake of all was violating my Jason Williams rule (former New Jersey Nets power forward who had no offense, but was a good defender). They foolishly gave Ben Wallace a larger than life contract even though he was an offensive liability and couldn’t shoot free throws. I know he was a great defender, rebounder, and played excelent team defence, but my rule is never, never, ever pay that kind of money to someone that offensively challenged. I cringed when the news came out about the signing.
With their other first round pick they got from the Knicks they took Joakim Noah. Another offensively challenged big man that couldn’t help them on the offensive end. What Chicago should have been looking to do is package that pick, plus one of their perimeter players and trade for a power forward who could score (add players to make up dollar difference).
What they were stuck with this past year was an over-rated team with malcontents that didn’t fit well together. Scott Skiles paid for that with his job, but Paxon was the one that caused it. One last miscalculation for the Bulls. With Kobe wanting a trade and Kevin Garnett on the table to be had, supposedly Chicago didn’t want to include Deng in hefty package for either. How can that happen? How can you not trade Deng, and either Gordon/Hinrich, in addition to a pick, or another young player for Garnett or Kobe?
They saw how Garnett helped Boston win a championship, but they were afraid to pull the trigger. Now that they have Derrick Rose, here is what I would do. They still need an inside presence, and veterans like Rasheed Wallace and Antonio McDyess may be available. I would also call Houston and see if Yau Ming would be available. He may not be, but you have to make the call.
Houston hasn’t gotten out of the first round with him, and he can’t seem to stay healthy for a whole season so I would at least inquire about him. Carlos Boozer is someone else I would find out about. Andres Nocioni, and Ben Gordon would be nice sign-and trade bait for the soon to be free agent power forward.
Presently constructed, the Bulls don’t work. Rose will make it a little better, but in order to contend they need a stud up front. Deng won’t be enough. Every on the team in my view would be considered expendable except for Rose. Paxon balked at moving pieces that he should have moved to get star quality players. I wouldn’t. I wouldn’t play fantasy basketball like Isiah Thomas, but as long as I don’t compromise my defensive philosophy, I wouldn’t be afraid to upgrade my roster.
Are you listening Chicago?
Posted in Basketball | Print | No Comments »
June 22, 2008 by editor.
When we talk about which sport has the best athletes, we have to define what it means to be a good athlete. The ability to sustain speed, strength, and agility simultaneously in competition, displaying the skill to excel at more than one sport.
Jim Thorpe comes to mind when we talk about men in the sports arena that were head and shoulders above everyone else. He won gold medals in the pentathlon, and decathlon in the 1912 Olympic games in Sweden, and played professional football and baseball.
His accomplishments landed him on the 1911 and 1912 All American football teams. Thorpe was considered the greatest athlete of his time. Who are the greatest athletes of our time? Every sport boasts good athletes, but which sport has the best?
For one, we can eliminate baseball players. While there are some studs that are in the major leagues, you don’t necessarily have to be in top physical shape to play. There are quite a few pitchers that are overweight and sport oversize midriffs, but it doesn’t inhibit their ability to throw or hit the baseball.
This doesn’t mean that they aren’t considered athletes, it just means that a lack of fitness doesn’t preclude them from doing their jobs. Add to that the fact their game is not very fast, and if you are not pitching, catching, or hitting you are basically waiting around for something to happen. For the most part they would not be good candidates for other sports like basketball and football.
Let’s compare football players and basketball players. Football players have to be in excellent shape to play. Lineman, linebackers, defensive backs, running backs, all have to be in tip top shape to compete. Their combination of strength, agility, and speed that is necessary to excel is unparalleled.
You have defensive lineman that are 250 plus pounds running down quarterbacks and running backs who are supposed to be faster. The players on a whole are much faster than they were in the 70’s and 80’s, and it is not uncommon any more for receivers, backs, and defensive backs to post forty yard dash times of 4.3 and below.
It’s not just all about the speed. Agility and quickness is evident at almost every position. Many defensive lineman (especially defensive ends) over match their counterparts by being too quick off the edge, or shooting the gaps. Offensive lineman may be the most un-athletic of the bunch, but the better ones are strong and quick, with good feet.
Bo Jackson and Deon Sanders come to mind. Both excelled at football and played professional baseball. Jackson stared with the Oakland Raiders and played baseball for the Kansas City Royals, and Sanders won super bowls with the 49ers and Dallas in the NFL, and played in a world series with the Atlanta Braves. They were football players first, baseball players second.
You don’t see baseball players transitioning to football, but we have seen football players play baseball. Many college football players have played on their school’s basketball teams as well. Regardless of their size their athleticism translated over well to the hardwood.
Charlie Ward of the Florida State Seminoles won a Heisman Trophy playing football, and was the starting point guard for their basketball team. He elected to play professional basketball and was a serviceable point guard for New York. His athleticism allowed him to choose between the two.
Outside linebackers may be the most athletic bunch of all, because they have to be strong enough to shed blockers and offensive lineman, fast enough to cover and run down backs and receivers, as well as quick and agile enough to get after the quarterback.
Looking at basketball players, their athleticism can’t be denied. They have to have more body control than the other athletes in the major sports because so much of their time is spent in the air. Having jumping ability is one thing, but being creative and agile while in the air is something totally different.
We have become used to watching the exploits of Michael Jordan, Vince Carter, Kobe Bryant, Dominique Wilkins, Julius Erving, and many others as they have defied gravity and done the unimaginable with no tera-firma to support them. No other sport requires as much in-the-air time as basketball.
What makes them special is the fact that they are very vulnerable while in that position, but have to focus on scoring, shooting, blocking a shot, and executing dunks. From a strength standpoint there are quite a few players coming in the NBA now that are not physically mature due to their age. You can get away with it if you are very talented (see Kevin Durant), but you can’t get away with it in the NFL.
Hakeem Olajuwon is a good example of a professional basketball player that was an exceptional athlete. His nickname was the dream, because there was no one you could compare him to with his cat like quickness, assortment of low post moves, and rare physical ability. At six feet and ten inches tall, he was constantly among the league leaders in steals, which was unheard of for a center.
Originally from Nigeria he excelled in soccer and played collegiately with Clyde Drexler at Houston (Phi Slama Jama). Olajuwon didn’t play basketball until he was seventeen years old but loved it immediately and realized that was the sport for him. He is generally regarded as one of the best to ever play his position.
Soccer professionals are good athletes, but we have not seen a professional soccer player cross over to another sport successfully. You have to use your hands well when it comes to the major American sports, and soccer players don’t use their hands.
Hockey pros are known for their skating skill and speed on the ice, in addition to their fighting. Their creative abilities on the ice are excellent, but don’t necessarily mean they are naturally athletic. The primary abilities needed in hockey are not needed in other sports, so they really stand alone as a sport.
Raphael Nadel is probably the most athletic of all the tennis players, with all due respect to Roger Federer. He shows his strength, speed and agility every time he plays, especially on clay. The women’s game boasts some good athletes as well, but the percentage is not that high if you look at tennis players as a group.
There are great athletes in all sports and we applaud them, but I believe football players for the most part are the best athletes in the world. It is a close call, but our gridiron professionals exhibit all the necessary attributes to make that claim. Their speed, strength and agility is demonstrated more on the football field then any other arena.
Posted in Baseball, Basketball, Football | Print | No Comments »
June 17, 2008 by editor.
Just when we thought we had seen just about everything from Tiger Woods, he once again finds a spectacular way to defy the odds and come out on top in a major.
It wasn’t the fact that he won. It was how he won that made this win special, and it also reinforced why he has no serious challengers or rivals. Tiger gets it done whether he is on his game or not, hurt, sick, you name it.
Besides his golf game, what Tiger has deep down within is unmatched by his peers. His focus and attention to detail can’t be shaken. It doesn’t matter to him whether there are 25,000 watching him take a big shot, or whether it is a practice shot on the range. His focus is the same.
His colleagues will eventually shrink under the pressure of the moment, or the fact that they are competing with Tiger. Woods not only believes that he will win, but he knows when the pressure is on he will perform his best.
The Mickelson’s, Garcia’s, Westwood’s, El’s, and Singh’s can’t honestly say that. They aren’t wired that way. The late Earl Woods trained and raised Tiger to be a once in a lifetime player, and to be the best, most disiplined player the sport has ever seen.
He is the most imaginative, creative, and athletic professional golfer in the sport’s history, and his work ethic is unparalleled. It is as if the other players are not even out there. Tiger is focused on becoming what he already knows he is and nothing else: the best player ever, with the most majors.
He is playing against himself basically. He didn’t beat Rocco Mediate on Monday, June 16th. He beat Mediate when his father (a former green beret) developed his mental focus, intestinal fortitude, and razor sharp game when he was a boy. What we are seeing is the manifestation of what was deposited in Tiger when he was a boy.
The other top players on the tour don’t believe they can win if they are neck and neck with Woods over the course of a last round, or even if they are ahead. They believe Tiger will do something spectacular to beat them.
Add to the fact that if you are in the same group with him, you are overwhelmed by the size of the gallery following him, and at some point get nervous.
Mediate made one big miscalculation in this U.S. Open. Eighteen hole playoff, and you are ahead by one stroke against Tiger Woods and one hole to go, and it’s a par 5. You know that Tiger will find a way to make a birdie. Mediate needed to make birdie on that hole and force Tiger to make eagle.
He had to figure that Tiger birdied to force the playoff, so if he needed another birdie, he would get it. Mediate had to have in his mind to birdie the whole if he was serious about winning. Anything less would be asking for Woods to extend the match. If he didn’t have that mindset, then he was playing to lose.
Tiger himself said that this was his greatest accomplishment. Oh, and did I mention that he had a bum knee due to surgury, and other than abbreviated practice, didn’t play since the last major.
Kudos to Rocco Mediate for putting up a fight, but we are in the middle of watching history happen and the books re-written, courtesy of Tiger Woods. Enjoy the ride.
Posted in Golf | Print | 1 Comment »
June 15, 2008 by editor.
As Boston looks to close out Los Angeles and add another NBA championship to their arsenal, it is not hard to figure out why the Lakers are having a hard time deciphering the Celtics.
For starters, it’s Kobe versus Boston’s whole team. No one has stepped up to be that consistent number two threat to take some of the heat off of Kobe. Pau Gasol was supposed to be that guy, but he is having problems scoring one on one versus Perkins and Garnett.
Lamar Odom hasn’t been a consistent second scoring option either. That leaves it squarely on the shoulders of Kobe to not only take over the game when necessary, but to create good scoring opportunities for his teammates.
Sasha Vujacic has provided a spark at times, but against the longer, athletic Celtics, he has been inconsistent.
Boston hasn’t had that problem. They know if Paul Pierce is struggling they can look to Garnett and Ray Allen to carry the load. They play with a confidence that sooner or latter, at least one of them will get hot and spark the team.
The Lakers much publicized bench has been marginalized by the Celtics bench and physical play. We forget that James Posey and Sam Cassell have championship resume’s and are used to pressure situations. P.J. Brown and Leon Powe’s physical play and rebounding have made Ronnie Turiaf a non factor.
Jordan Farmar has not been able to provide a consistent spark like he did in the regular season as well. Boston’s transition defense has forced the Laker second unit to play a lot of half court offense, and they have not thrived.
Boston has just been tougher than Los Angeles also. They are the ones willing to mix it up and put a body on someone in the paint. The Laker bigs are not matching them, and I don’t think they can.
Los Angeles only chance is to run and get easy baskets as opposed to standing around on offense and waiting for someone to make a move. They need to push the tempo on every Celtic miss, but too many times they have been tentative.
Bottom line: Boston is a better team and too tough a match-up for this Laker team. My last word on this is my original prediction. Boston in six.
Posted in Basketball | Print | No Comments »